RESUMO
The purpose of this study was to compare the response of hepatitis B vaccination with different vaccination schedules among seronegative adults, and to provide suitable vaccination schedules for floating and fixed population. The study included adults aged 20 to 39 y without prior history of vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine. The serum samples were collected and tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) levels. Out of all, 686 adults who were negative for anti-HBs, anti-HBc and HBsAg were vaccinated with 10 ug hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1 and 3, 6 or 12 month schedules, and their antibody titers were monitored. The rates of completion of the vaccination in floating and fixed population were 90.4% and 94.1% respectively (p = 0.061). The anti-HBs positive rates in adults vaccinated at 0, 1 and 3 ,6 or 12 month were 83.9%, 88.2% and 94.2% respectively (P = 0.0003). The corresponding geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 61.19 (95%CI:47.10-81.23) mIU/mL, 214.04(95%CI:157.14-291.61) mIU/mL and 345.78(95%CI:251.25-475.77) mIU/mL, respectively ( P < 0.0001). Vaccination of hepatitis B with both 0-1-6 and 0-1-12 month schedules in adults result in better level of immune responses. Also, a longer vaccination schedule (0-1-12 month) may be more suitable for floating population and 0-1-6 month schedule is recommended for the fixed population.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinação/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus concerning small bowel preparation before capsule endoscopy (CE). This study evaluated the effects of 4 regimens on small bowel cleansing and diagnostic yield. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group A consumed a clear liquid diet after lunch on the day before CE, followed by overnight fasting. Group B took 250 mL 20% mannitol and 1 L 0.9% saline orally at 05:00 hours on the day of the procedure. In group C, the same regimen was taken at 20:00 hours on the day before and at 05:00 hours on the day of CE. In group D, in addition to the group C regimen, 20 mL oral simethicone was taken 30 minutes before CE. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were prospectively enrolled, and 7 were excluded from the final analysis because of incomplete small bowel transit. No significant difference was noted among the 4 groups for small bowel transit time. Bowel preparation in group D was significantly better than for the other regimens for overall cleansing of the proximal small bowel, and showed improved overall cleansing of the distal small bowel when compared with 10-hours overnight fasting. Pathological lesions of the proximal and distal small bowel were, respectively, achieved in 82 and 74 patients, mostly distributed in group D. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel preparation that involves split-dose oral mannitol plus single-dose simethicone for CE can improve mucosal visualization and subsequent diagnostic yield when compared with 10-hours overnight fasting.